SpeedLab der BpB zum Thema “Mobiles Lernen – Unabhängig von Raum und Zeit?”

SpeedLab-Hannover_20130426_101652

Am 26. April 2013 fand in Hannover das SpeedLab der Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung zum Thema “Mobiles Lernen – Unabhängig von Raum und Zeit?” (#SLML13) statt. Neben Impulsvorträgen von Kerstin Mayrberger und Marcus Specht waren Lernlabs und eine abschließende Podiumsdisukssion (siehe Aufzeichnung unten oder hier), an der ich neben Herbert Jancke (n-21: Schulen in Niedersachsen online e.V.), André Spang (Kaiserin Augusta Schule Köln und iPad-Projekt, Schulwiki der Stadt Köln) und  Torsten Springer (Samsung Education) als Teilnehmerin geladen war, Teil der Veranstaltung. Die Diskussion stand unter der Überschrift “Zwischen Innovation, Crowd und Kommerz”, sondiert werden sollten in Ansätzen sowohl status quo des Lernens mit Mobiltechnologien in der Schule als auch Zukunft von mobiler Schule.
Ich habe dabei in Anlehnung an die Arbeit der London Mobile Learning Group (LMLG) die Position der Öffnung der Schule für den (medialen) Alltag der Lerner vertreten. Damit ist jedoch nicht gemeint, dass sich Lehrer in Facebook mit ihren Schülern befreunden, deren Twitter streems folgen oder auf Instagram Fotos mit ihnen tauschen sollen; denn Schule darf nicht den Anspruch erheben, in das Privatleben der Schüler Einzug zu halten oder jede freie Minute mit schulischem Lernen zu besetzen. Vielmehr geht es um die Interessen, Kompetenzen und das Wissen, die sich Schüler in ihrem Alltag über und mit Medien aneignen.

Mehr

Mobile Learning. Potential and controversy embodied in a young scientific field, and arising consequences for future research and practice.

Folie28

On March 27 and 28, 2012 the conference “Educational Media Ecologies – International Perspectives” took place at the University of Paderborn (Germany). As I was not able to attend in person I submitted a video presentation that can be watched below or by clicking here. The slides are embedded below and can also be accessed via the slideshare website, the abstract is available below as well as on the conference website.

Mehr

Mobile Learning – potential, controversies and implications for future R&P in networked (informal) learning

SoMobNet-Presentation_21Nov2011

On Monday, 21 November 2011 I gave a presentation at the SoMobNet Roundtable, IoE London, about social and networked learning from the perspective of the mobile learning discussion. Title of the presentation was “Mobile Learning – Potential and controversies embodied in a young scientific field and arising consequences for future research and practice with view to social, networked and (informal) learning”. The slides are available below and here via the Cloudworks page of the SoMobNet Roundtable, the extended version of the abstract can be found below as well.

Mehr

Providing continuity for learner centred learning with mobile phones in schools

Figure-06_JIM2008_Internet-Aktivitäten 2008_redux

The following article is a follow up of my presentation given at a Mobile Media Seminar at the University of Aarhus (DK) in March 2008.

Seipold, Judith (2008): Mobile learning at the interface between formal and informal learning. Harnessing mobile phones and their modes of representation for curricular learning. Seminar Mobile Media, 10. März 2008, Aarhus Universitet, Centre for IT & Learning, Aarhus.

The article was written in English (not the best English) and translated into Danish. The Danish language version was published in 2010.

Seipold, Judith (2010): Kan brugen af mobiletelefoner i undervisningen styrke elev-centrerede læreprocesser? (Englischer Titel: Providing continuity for learner centred learning with mobile phones in schools). In: Bang, Joergen; Dalsgaard, Christian (Red.): Læring & Medier (LOM), Nr. 5: Læring i videnssamfundet. Om vidensformidling, videnskonstruktion og vidensdeling. ISSN 1903-248X. Online.

Mehr

Die London Mobile Learning Group (LMLG)

Die -LMLG_logoLMLG

Als Mitglied der London Mobile Learning Group (LMLG) wurde ich gebeten, einen kurzen Beitrag zu den Aktivitäten und Zielen der LMLG zu erfassen. Da von der Redaktion letztlich jedoch ein anderer Schwerpunkt gewünscht wurde, habe ich beschlossen, den Artikel hier zu veröffentlichen:

Mehr

Digitale Identitäten (digital identities)

digitale-identitaeten_IMG_2192

ENGLISH INTRO:
In preparation for an online panel discussion – which finally didn’t take place – I collected a few headwords concerning “digital identities”. They are covered under the sections theoretical framework, phenomena from media use in everyday-life, and a few conclusions about identity and identity construction.
This will not be further elaborated at this place. More detailled exaplanations – especially regarding the two examples – can be found in Rummler, Seipold (forthcoming) und in Pachler et al. (2010).

DEUTSCHES INTRO:
Zur Vorbereitung auf eine online Panel-Diskussion, die allerdings nicht stattfand, habe ich ein paar Stichpunkte zu “Digital Identities” vorbereitet. Sie umfassen Literatur für den theoretischen Rahmen, zwei Phänomene aus dem Alltag und ein paar zusammenfassende Fazits zu Identität und Identitätskonstruktion.
An dieser Stelle bleibt das so und zunächst ohne weitere Ausarbeitung stehen. Detailliertere Ausführungen sind in den jeweiligen Referenzen zu finden, bezogen auf die beiden aufgeführten Phänomene insbesondere in Rummler, Seipold (forthcoming) und in Pachler et al. (2010).

Theory

Anthony Giddens (Giddens 1991)

  • Identity is constructed by the individual
  • Identity “is a person’s own reflexive understanding of their biography” (Gauntlett 2011b)
  • Continuity of identity is self-constructed (Gauntlett 2011b). In fact, identity is discontinuous and hypertexually linked.
  • Identity is wrapped in narrations.
  • Example of Cyrill can give evidence to: These narrations appear in the digital on-line world on different platforms and are pointing to different aspects of one’s identity.

Klaus Hurrelmann (2001)

  • Identity is constructed in the process of socialisation, i.e. “the productive procession of the inner and outer reality” (see Hurrelmann 2001)

John Potter (2011)

  • “concept of “curating the self” as an essential skill and disposition in lived culture” (Potter 2011, p. 53)
  • “multiple versions of the self are distributed across YouTube, Blogs, Facebook, Twitter and more” (Potter 2011, p. 54)

Ulrich Beck (Beck 1986)

  • Risk society
  • Identity construction is taking decisions and choices and dealing with risks

Gerhard Schulze (Schulze 2000)

  • Erlebnisgesellschaft (event/fun oriented society)
  • The individual is eagerly keen to have fun, the construction of live is centred around this aim, and the subject/the individual in the centre of his or her experiences

Stuart Hall (Hall 1980)

  • decoding-encoding
  • “patterns of ‘preferred readings’” (Hall 1980, p. 134)

Phenomenon (an example) 1:
Cyrill (see Pachler, Bachmair, Cook 2010)

  • Example: A 17 years old with partly migration background has account on different online platforms. He produces videos and shows them on youtube, he has  my space account and presents some artwork there, he is active on fora and gives advise concerning video processing software and digital video cameras and so on.
  • Results: By presenting his outputs and showing/talking about his skills, he represents himself as angry against the society, as vulnerable, as victim, as creative, as expert, as pupil, as teacher, as reflecting, as rich, as poor.
  • Results: He gives his appearance different directions. He and his identity appears to be made of contradictions and inconsistent.
  • Danger: He addresses different target groups on different platforms. The danger is that his audience judges him according to only one of the snippets of his digital identity. (On the other hand: This might be intended by the young man).
  • Meta: Instead of talking about online identity one should rather consider to talk about different facettes of the identity that find space and framing at different places – in the net and outside the net.
  • Meta: There is no “either – or” but only an “as well as”

Phenomenon (an example) 2:
Ringtones on mobile phones (Rummler, Seipold forthcoming)

  • Example: Music according to ones taste of music, soudns such as farts or belches, national anthems etc.
  • Results: By playing these sounds in the public give a glance at the mobile phone owner’s taste, or social or peer association and so on.
  • Danger: Fast labelling (according to ones preferred reading patterns) of people who show their music and/or social preferences and to impute the aim to provoce to them.
  • Meta: The use of specific ringtones is participation: participation in discourses
  • about what is right or wrong in public contexts (ethics)
  • about me belonging to a distinctive group of people instead of to belonging to the masses
  • about showing a part of my identity, and being proud of it

Conclusions

  • Identity is constructed in the process of socialisation
  • Identity is constructed self-responsible
  • Identity is constructed through appropriation
  • Identity is also a result of choices and decisions
  • Identity is constructed non-linear
  • Indentity and identity construction is always meaningful
  • Identity construction is never finished
  • Identity is distinctive
  • Identity can provoke
  • Identity is occasion to establish and to join discourses
  • Identity is the freedom to see things differently
  • Identity is made available to others as either linear or non-linear story/multimedia and multi modal constructs (media production)
  • Facettes of identities can be linked to discourses/ provoke discourses
  • People tend to be judged according to facettes of their identity

References

Beck, Ulrich (1986): Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Erstausgabe). Edition Suhrkamp: 1365 (Neue Folge Band 365). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch-Verl.

Gauntlett, David (2011a): Anthony Giddens. A brief introduction to Giddens’ general approach, plus more detail on his ideas about self, gender and identity in modern societies. Online: http://www.theory.org.uk/giddens.htm.

Gauntlett, David (2011b): Anthony Giddens: The reflexive project of the self. Retrieved from: http://www.theory.org.uk/giddens5.htm.

Giddens, Anthony (1991): Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press. Retrieved from: http://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780745609324.pdf.

Hall, Stuart (1980): Encoding/decoding. In: Hall, Stuart u.a. (Hrsg.): Culture, media, language; Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-1979.

Hurrelmann, Klaus (2001): Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorie (7., neu ausgestattete Ausgabe). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.

Pachler, Norbert, Bachmair, Ben, Cook, John (2010): Mobile learning: structures, agency, practices. New York: Springer. Retrieved from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/v65pt8/.

Potter, John (2011): Creation and curatorship in new media. In: Rummler, Klaus; Seipold, Judith; Lübcke, Eileen; Pachler, Norbert; Attwell, Graham (Hrsg.) (2011): Mobile learning: Crossing boundaries in convergent environments. 21-22 March 2011, Bremen. Book of abstracts, p. 53-56. Retrieved from: http://www.londonmobilelearning.net/downloads/MLCB_BOA_Bremen-2011_Crossing-Boundaries-full_2011-03-18.pdf.

Rummler, Klaus, Seipold, Judith (forthcoming): “Nicht ohne mein Handy!” Alltagsnutzung, Risiken und Bildungschancen eines allgegenwärtigen Geräts. Schüler. Wissen für Lehrer (Heft 2011: Virtuelle Welten).

Schulze, Gerhard (2000): Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. 8. Auflage, Studienausgabe, Frankfurt a.M.: Campus Verlag.

Website, concept & content © 2012 judith-seipold.de. Theme © 2010 Rockwell - Business and Portfolio Wordpress Theme by freshface.